Second cancers among 40,576 testicular cancer patients: focus on long-term survivors.

نویسندگان

  • Lois B Travis
  • Sophie D Fosså
  • Sara J Schonfeld
  • Mary L McMaster
  • Charles F Lynch
  • Hans Storm
  • Per Hall
  • Eric Holowaty
  • Aage Andersen
  • Eero Pukkala
  • Michael Andersson
  • Magnus Kaijser
  • Mary Gospodarowicz
  • Timo Joensuu
  • Randi J Cohen
  • John D Boice
  • Graça M Dores
  • Ethel S Gilbert
چکیده

BACKGROUND Although second primary cancers are a leading cause of death among men with testicular cancer, few studies have quantified risks among long-term survivors. METHODS Within 14 population-based tumor registries in Europe and North America (1943-2001), we identified 40,576 1-year survivors of testicular cancer and ascertained data on any new incident solid tumors among these patients. We used Poisson regression analysis to model relative risks (RRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) of second solid cancers. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS A total of 2,285 second solid cancers were reported in the cohort. The relative risk and EAR decreased with increasing age at testicular cancer diagnosis (P < .001); the EAR increased with attained age (P < .001) but the excess RR decreased. Among 10-year survivors diagnosed with testicular cancer at age 35 years, the risk of developing a second solid tumor was increased (RR = 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.8 to 2.1). Risk remained statistically significantly elevated for 35 years (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.5 to 2.0; P < .001). We observed statistically significantly elevated risks, for the first time, for cancers of the pleura (malignant mesothelioma; RR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.7 to 5.9) and esophagus (RR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0 to 2.6). Cancers of the lung (RR = 1.5, 95% CI = 1.2 to 1.7), colon (RR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.7 to 2.5), bladder (RR = 2.7, 95% CI = 2.2 to 3.1), pancreas (RR = 3.6, 95% CI = 2.8 to 4.6), and stomach (RR = 4.0, 95% CI = 3.2 to 4.8) accounted for almost 60% of the total excess. Overall patterns were similar for seminoma and nonseminoma patients, with lower risks observed for nonseminoma patients treated after 1975. Statistically significantly increased risks of solid cancers were observed among patients treated with radiotherapy alone (RR = 2.0, 95% CI = 1.9 to 2.2), chemotherapy alone (RR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.3 to 2.5), and both (RR = 2.9, 95% CI = 1.9 to 4.2). For patients diagnosed with seminomas or nonseminomatous tumors at age 35 years, cumulative risks of solid cancer 40 years later (i.e., to age 75 years) were 36% and 31%, respectively, compared with 23% for the general population. CONCLUSIONS Testicular cancer survivors are at statistically significantly increased risk of solid tumors for at least 35 years after treatment. Young patients may experience high levels of risk as they reach older ages. The statistically significantly increased risk of malignant mesothelioma in testicular cancer survivors has, to our knowledge, not been observed previously in a cohort of patients treated with radiotherapy.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Risk of second primary cancers after testicular cancer in East and West Germany: A focus on contralateral testicular cancers

Testicular cancer survival rates improved dramatically after cisplatin-based therapy was introduced in the 1970s. However, chemotherapy and radiation therapy are potentially carcinogenic. The purpose of this study was to estimate the risk of developing second primary cancers including the risk associated with primary histologic type (seminoma and non-seminoma) among testicular cancer survivors ...

متن کامل

Induced second cancers after prostate-cancer radiotherapy: no cause for concern?

( he absolute risks of a radiation-induced second cancer mong long-term radiotherapy survivors are not large, typcally a few percent in older patients (1–4). Hence the very eal concern, expressed by Kendal et al. (5) in this issue, hat prostate cancer patients may be unduly influenced in heir treatment decision by unbalanced media reports of econd-cancer risks. It is certainly the responsibilit...

متن کامل

Second cancers after testicular cancer diagnosed after 1980 in Sweden.

BACKGROUND Testicular cancer treatment has become standardized in the 1980s involving radiotherapy preferentially for seminoma and chemotherapy for nonseminoma. The late effects of these therapeutic practices have not been properly evaluated because of the relatively short time since their application. PATIENTS AND METHODS We conducted a study among 5533 survivors of testicular cancer on the ...

متن کامل

Quality of life in long-term survivors of adult-onset cancers.

The long-term survival of cancer patients has risen dramatically during the last few decades, yet little is known about the quality of life experienced by these survivors. This paper reviews research on the quality of life in long-term cancer survivors to identify quality-of-life concerns in this population, to provide a critical evaluation of the literature, and to suggest areas for future res...

متن کامل

The story of second cancers in patients cured of testicular cancer: tarnishing success or burnishing irrelevance?

In some regards, the study by Travis et al. (1) on second cancers in long-term survivors of testicular cancer, reported in this issue of the Journal, is tantamount to unearthing a time capsule or encountering the forward ripple from a stone dropped in a pond long ago. This study is generally consistent with other reports from long-term cancer registries. In aggregate, these works demonstrate an...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Journal of the National Cancer Institute

دوره 97 18  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2005